From: <Saved by Microsoft Internet Explorer 5>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RADIOACTIVE_HA?=
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?LOS_IN_A_RADIO?=
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?CHRONOLOGICAL_?=
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?AND_COSMOLOGIC?=
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?AL_PERSPECTIVE?=
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:09:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02DB_01C4003E.6F827710";
	type="text/html"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3314.1001

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_02DB_01C4003E.6F827710
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: =?iso-8859-1?B?aHR0cDovL3d3dy5oYWw=?=
	=?iso-8859-1?B?b3MuY29tL2Jvb2swMS8=?=
	=?iso-8859-1?B?Ym9vay5odG0=?=

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RADIOACTIVE HALOS IN A RADIOCHRONOLOGICAL AND =
COSMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE</TITLE>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3314.1001" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE border=3D0 cellPadding=3D2 cellSpacing=3D2 width=3D"95%">
  <TBODY>
  <TR>
    <TD><B><FONT size=3D5>
      <P align=3Dcenter>RADIOACTIVE HALOS IN A RADIOCHRONOLOGICAL AND =
COSMOLOGICAL=20
      PERSPECTIVE</P></B></FONT>
      <CENTER>Robert V. Gentry*<BR>Columbia Union College<BR>Takoma =
Park,=20
      Maryland 20012</CENTER>
      <P>If the earth was created, it is axiomatic that created =
(primordial)=20
      rocks must now exist on the earth, and if there was a Flood there =
must now=20
      exist sedimentary rocks and other evidences of that event. But, if =
the=20
      general uniformitarian principle is correct, the universe evolved =
to its=20
      present state only by the unvarying action of known physical laws =
and all=20
      natural phenomena must fit into the evolutionary mosaic. If this=20
      fundamental principle is wrong, all the pieces in the evolutionary =
mosaic=20
      become unglued. Evidence that something is drastically wrong comes =
from=20
      the fact that this basic evolutionary premise has failed to =
provide a=20
      verifiable explanation for the widespread occurrence of Po halos =
in=20
      Precambrian granites, a phenomena which I suggest are in situ =
evidences=20
      that those rocks were created almost instantaneously in accord =
with Psalm=20
      33:6,9: "By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all =
the host=20
      of them by the breath of his mouth. For he spake, and it was done; =
he=20
      commanded, and it stood fast." I have challenged my colleagues to=20
      synthesize a piece of granite with <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos as a =
means of=20
      falsifying this interpretation, but have not received a response. =
It is=20
      logical that this synthesis should be possible if the =
uniformitarian=20
      principle is true. Underdeveloped U halos in coalified wood having =
high=20
      U/Pb ratios are cited evidences for a Flood-related recent (within =
the=20
      past few thousand years) emplacement of geological formations =
thought to=20
      be more than 100,000,000 years old. Results of differential He =
analyses of=20
      zircons taken from deep granite cores are evidence for a recently =
created,=20
      several-thousand-year-age of the earth. A creation model with =
three=20
      singularities, involving events beyond explanation by known =
physical laws,=20
      is proposed to account for these evidences. The first singularity =
is the=20
      <U>ex</U> nihilo creation of our galaxy nearly 6000 years ago. =
Finally, a=20
      new model for the structure of the universe is proposed based on =
the idea=20
      that all galaxies, including the Milky Way, are revolving about =
the Center=20
      of the universe, which from Psalm 103:19 I equate with the fixed =
location=20
      of God's throne. This model requires an absolute reference frame =
in the=20
      universe whereas modern Big Bang cosmology mandates there is no =
Center=20
      (the Cosmological Principle) and no absolute reference frame (the =
theory=20
      of relativity). The notion of the solar system through the cosmic=20
      microwave radiation is cited as unequivocal evidence for the =
existence of=20
      an absolute reference frame.</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D837=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image1.jpg" width=3D577></P><I>
      <P>Figure 1. The scale for all photomicrographs is 1 cm =3D 25 =
<FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m, except for (h=92) and (r=92), =
which are=20
      enlargements of (h) and (r). (a) Schematic drawing of =
<SUP>238</SUP>U halo=20
      with radii proportional to ranges of alpha particles in air. (b) =
Schematic=20
      of <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halo. (e) Coloration band formed in mica by =
7.7-MeV=20
      <SUP>4</SUP>He ions. Arrow shows direction of beam penetration. =
(f) A=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U halo in biotite formed by sequential alpha decay =
of the=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U decay series. (g) Embryonic <SUP>238</SUP>U halo =
in=20
      fluorite with only two rings developed. (h) Normally developed=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U halo in fluorite with nearly all rings visible. =
(h') Same=20
      halo as in (h) but at higher magnification. (i) Well developed=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U halo in fluorite with slightly blurred rings. (j)=20
      Overexposed <SUP>238</SUP>U halo in fluorite, showing inner ring=20
      obliteration. (k) Two overexposed <SUP>238</SUP>U halos in =
fluorite,=20
      showing outer ring reversal effects. (m) Second-stage reversal in =
a=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U halo in fluorite. The ring sizes are unrelated to=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U alpha particle ranges. (n) Three <SUP>21O</SUP>Po =
halos of=20
      light, medium, and very dark coloration in biotite. Note the =
difference in=20
      radius. (o) Three <SUP>210</SUP>Po halos of varying degrees of =
coloration=20
      in fluorite. (p) A <SUP>214</SUP>Po halo in biotite. (q) Two=20
      <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos in biotite. (r) Two <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos =
in=20
      fluorite. (r') Same halos as in (r) but at higher magnification.=20
      (Reprinted from ref. (2) by permission of the AAAS.)</P></I>
      <P>&nbsp;</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D770=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image2.jpg" width=3D610></P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>URANIUM AND THORIUM RADIOHALOS IN =
MINERALS</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>A radioactive halo is generally defined as any =
type of=20
      discolored, radiation-damaged region within a mineral and usually =
results=20
      from either alpha or, more rarely, beta emission from a central=20
      radioactive inclusion. When the central inclusions, or =
radiocenters, are=20
      small (1 <FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m), the U and Th =
daughter=20
      alpha emitters produce a series of discolored concentric spheres, =
which in=20
      thin section appear microscopically as concentric rings whose =
radii=20
      correspond to the ranges of the various alpha emitters in the =
mineral.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Ordinary radiohalos are herein defined as those =
which=20
      initiate with <SUP>238</SUP>U and/or <SUP>232</SUP>Th alpha decay =
(1),=20
      irrespective of whether the actual U or Th halo closely matches =
the=20
      respective idealized alpha decay patterns. In a few instances the =
match is=20
      very good.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Compare, for example, the idealized U halo ring =
pattern=20
      in Fig. 1a with the well developed U halos in biotite (Fig. 1f) =
and=20
      fluorite (Fig. 1h,h'); these halos have ring sizes that agree very =
well=20
      (1,2) with the <SUP>4</SUP>He ion accelerator-induced coloration =
bands in=20
      these minerals (see Table 1). In general a halo ring can be =
assigned to a=20
      definite alpha emitter with confidence only when the halo =
radiocenter is=20
      about 1<FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m in size.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>In other cases, however, such as the halos in =
fluorite=20
      (1,2) shown in Fig. 1(g, i-m), much work was required before these =
halos=20
      could be reliably associated with U alpha decay (2). As explained=20
      elsewhere (2), reversal effects accompanying extreme radiation =
damage=20
      caused the appearance of rings that could not be associated with =
definite=20
      alpha emitters of the U decay chain. Thus some halos may exhibit a =
ring=20
      structure different from the idealized U and/or Th alpha decay =
patterns=20
      because of reversal effects. And even though most other halos =
exhibit=20
      blurred ring structures due to the large size of the inclusions,=20
      nevertheless the outer dimensions allow them to be classified as U =
and/or=20
      Th types.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Modern analytical techniques such as Scanning =
Electron=20
      Microscope X Ray Fluo-resence (SEMXRF) and Ion Microprobe Mass=20
      Spectrometry (IMMA) methods have been utilized to show that U and =
Th and=20
      their respective end-product isotopes of Pb are contained within =
the U and=20
      Th halo radiocenters. As is noted shortly, these modern analytical =

      techniques have proved quite valuable in demonstrating that Po =
halo=20
      radiocenters in minerals contain little or no U or Th, which is in =
direct=20
      contrast to the abundance of these elements detected in the U =
and/or Th=20
      halo radiocenters (2,3).</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter>RADIOACTIVE HALOS AND THE QUESTION OF INVARIANT =
DECAY=20
      RATES</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>A most important question pertaining to the=20
      evolution/creation issue is whether radioactive decay rates have =
remained=20
      invariant during the course of earth history. If they have,=20
      geochronologists are justified in interpreting various =
parent/daughter=20
      isotope ratios found in undisturbed rocks in terms of elapsed =
time. If on=20
      the other hand there have been periods in earth history where the =
decay=20
      rate was higher (i. e., during a singularity), then in general the =
isotope=20
      ratios in rocks would not reflect elapsed time except in the =
specific case=20
      where secondary rocks or substances containing only the parent=20
      radio-nuclide formed at the end of the most recent singularity. =
The=20
      practical significance of this last statement will be evident in =
the=20
      discussion of the secondary, U halos found in coalified wood =
specimens=20
      from the Colorado Plateau.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Even though most of Joly's (4) measurements of =
U and Th=20
      halos showed their radii were about the sizes expected from the =
alpha=20
      decay energies of the U and Th decay chains, nevertheless he =
claimed there=20
      were slight discrepancies which raised questions about whether the =

      radioactive decay rate had been constant over geological time. His =
result=20
      was not confirmed however by later halo radii measurements (5-10), =
which=20
      agreed to within experimental error with the theoretical sizes. To =

      eliminate any uncertainty about this correspondence I irradiated =
specimens=20
      of various minerals with He ion beams of varying energies to =
produce=20
      different size coloration bands whose widths corresponded to the =
various=20
      alpha energies of the U decay chain. The results of these =
experiments,=20
      presented in Table 1, show there is excellent agreement between =
the U and=20
      Th halo radii and equivalent He ion produced penetration depths =
(2).</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The basis for thinking that standard size U and =
Th halos=20
      imply an invariant decay rate throughout geological time proceeds =
from the=20
      quantum mechanical treatment of alpha decay, which in general =
shows that=20
      the probability for alpha decay for a given nuclide is dependent =
on the=20
      energy with which the alpha particle is emitted from the nucleus. =
The=20
      argument is that if the decay rate had varied in the past, then =
the U and=20
      Th halo rings would be of different size now because the energies =
of the=20
      alpha particles would have been different during the period of =
change.=20
      This argument assumes that a change in the decay rate must =
necessarily be=20
      explainable by quantum mechanics, which is of course an integral =
part of=20
      the uniformitarian framework. Thus, the usual proof of decay rate=20
      invariance based on standard size U and Th halos is nothing more =
than a=20
      circular argument which assumes the general uniformitarian =
principle is=20
      correct. In fact, the failure of the uniformitarian principle to =
explain=20
      the evidence for creation presented herein invalidates the basis =
for the=20
      above proof.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>POLONIUM, DWARF, AND GIANT HALOS IN =
MINERALS</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Of the three types of unusual halos that appear =
distinct=20
      from those formed by U and/or Th alpha decay, only the Po halos, =
Fig.1=20
      (b-d, n-r, r=92), can presently be identified with known alpha =
radioactivity=20
      (1-3,11-13). Po halos occupy a special niche in my creation model, =
and=20
      these halos will be discussed in more detail subsequently. Several =
lines=20
      of evidence which indicate the enigmatic dwarf halos (see Fig. 2) =
were=20
      produced by some presently unidentified radioactivity have been =
summarized=20
      (1,12,14,15). The rapid etch from HF and the K/Ca inversion are =
strongly=20
      characteristic of highly radiation-damaged regions.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The characteristics of the giant halos found in =
a certain=20
      Madagascan mica have also been summarized (1,14,16), and while no=20
      definitive evidence as yet exists for a radioactive origin, some =
halos=20
      with opaque inclusions in this same mica exhibit isotopic =
anomalies which=20
      raise questions about the uniformity of U and Th alpha decay. For =
example,=20
      the mass scans and x-ray fluorescence analyses shown in Fig. 3 =
clearly=20
      indicate that, whereas both the monazite and opaque inclusions =
exhibit=20
      <SUP>206</SUP>Pb and <SUP>207</SUP>Pb from U decay, the opaque =
inclusions=20
      exhibit a marked deficiency of <SUP>208</SUP>Pb from =
<SUP>232</SUP>Th=20
      decay (14).</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D307=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image3.jpg" width=3D608></P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>SECONDARY RADIOHALOS IN COALIFIED WOOD</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>All the various types of halos discussed thus =
far are=20
      termed primary halos because they developed from alpha =
radioactivity=20
      emanating from small accessory inclusions that were present when =
the=20
      mineral crystallized. But secondary halos also exist in pieces of=20
      coalified wood taken from highly uraniferous deposits in the =
Colorado=20
      Plateau. There is abundant evidence that U solutions infiltrated =
much of=20
      the sedimentary material in the geological formations of that =
region when=20
      the wood was still in a gel-like condition (17). When U-bearing =
solutions=20
      passed through pieces of wood, certain active sites within these =
specimens=20
      preferentially collected U, other sites collected rare earth type=20
      elements, and still others Se, Po, and Pb. It is quite significant =
that=20
      the U halos, which developed around the tiny U-rich sites, are all =

      underdeveloped, which, on the basis of a uniform decay rate (the =
rationale=20
      for using this assumption for these specimens will be explained=20
      subsequently), suggests only a relatively short time since U =
infiltration.=20
      Ion microprobe mass scans of these U halo centers have shown =
extremely=20
      high <SUP>238</SUP>U/<SUP>206</SUP>Pb ratios, which, again on the=20
      assumption of a uniform decay rate, is consistent with a U =
infiltration=20
      within the last several thousand years (17).</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D811=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image4.jpg" width=3D608></P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Similar underdeveloped U halos have been found =
in the=20
      coalified wood from the Chattanooga Shale, and in fact recent ion=20
      microprobe analyses show, in agreement with earlier results (17), =
that the=20
      <SUP>238</SUP>U/<SUP>206</SUP>Pb ratios of the U halos in the =
Colorado=20
      Plateau samples (Eocene, Triassic, and Jurassic) and the =
Chattanooga Shale=20
      (Devonian) are virtually indistinguishable. These results suggest =
that=20
      U-infiltration occurred concurrently in all these formations.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Another class of more sharply defined halos was =
also=20
      discovered in the Colorado Plateau coalified wood specimens (17). =
The=20
      centers of these halos exhibit a distinct metallic-like =
reflectance when=20
      viewed with reflected light. Three different varieties of this =
halo exist:=20
      one with a circular cross section, another with an elliptical =
cross=20
      section with variable major and minor axes, and a third most =
unusual one=20
      that is actually a dual halo, being a composite of a circular and =
an=20
      elliptical halo around exactly the same radio-center (see Figs. =
4-6).</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Although the elliptical halos differ radically =
from the=20
      circular halos in minerals, the circular type resembles the=20
      <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halo in minerals and variations in the radii of =
circular=20
      halos approximate the calculated penetrated distances (26 to 31 =
<FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m) of the <SUP>21O</SUP>Po alpha =
particle=20
      (energy E =3D 5.3 MeV) in this coalified wood (17). Henderson (18) =
theorized=20
      that Po halos might form in minerals when U-daughter Po isotopes =
or their=20
      alpha precursors were preferentially accumulated into small =
inclusions=20
      from some nearby U source. This hypothesis has not been confirmed =
for the=20
      origin of three distinct types of Po halos in U-poor minerals (1, =
2, 11),=20
      but it does seem to provide a reasonable explanation for the =
origin of=20
      <SUP>210</SUP>Po halos in U-rich coalified wood specimens.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Electron microscope x-ray fluorescence analyses =
showed=20
      these halo centers were mainly Pb and Se. This composition fits =
well into=20
      the secondary accumulation hypothesis for both of the U-daughters, =

      <SUP>210</SUP>Po (half-life, t<SUB>=BD</SUB> =3D 138 days) and its =
beta=20
      precursor <SUP>21O</SUP>Pb (t<SUB>=BD </SUB>=3D 22 y), possess the =
two=20
      characteristics that are vitally essential for the hypothesis: (i) =

      chemical similarity with the elements in the inclusion and (ii) =
half-lives=20
      sufficiently long to permit accumulation prior to decay, a =
requirement=20
      related to the nuclide transport rate.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>What is the meaning of the <SUP>21O</SUP>Po =
halos in=20
      Figs. 4-6? Clearly, the variations in shape can be attributed to =
plastic=20
      deformation which occurred prior coalification. Since the model =
for=20
      <SUP>210</SUP>Po formation thus envisions that both =
<SUP>210</SUP>Po and=20
      <SUP>21O</SUP>Pb were accumulating simultaneously in the Pb-Se =
inclusion,=20
      a spherical <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halo could develop in 0.5 to 1 year =
from the=20
      <SUP>21O</SUP>Po atoms initially resent and a second similar=20
      <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halo could develop in 25 to 50 years as the=20
      <SUP>21O</SUP>Pb atoms more slowly beta decayed to produce another =
crop of=20
      <SUP>210</SUP>Po atoms. If there was no deformation of the matrix =
between=20
      these periods, the two <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halos would simply =
coincide. If,=20
      however, the matrix was deformed between the two periods of halo=20
      formation, then the first halo would have been compressed into an=20
      ellipsoid, and the second would be a normal sphere. The result =
would be a=20
      dual "halo" (Fig. 6). The widespread occurrence of these dual =
halos in=20
      both Triassic and Jurassic specimens can actually be considered=20
      corroborative evidence for a one-time introduction of U into these =

      formations, because it is then possible to account for their =
structure on=20
      the basis of a single specifically timed tectonic event =
(17).</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>HALOS IN COALIFIED WOOD: A FLOOD-RELATED =
PHENONENA</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>A worldwide Flood, which is postulated to have =
occurred=20
      about 1650 years after creation, is the third singularity in the =
creation=20
      model proposed herein. I have advanced the hypothesis that the=20
      underdeveloped U halos in both the Colorado Plateau and =
Chattanooga Shale=20
      coalified wood specimens exhibit very high U/Pb ratios because the =
uranium=20
      infiltration of the wood occurred only when those geological =
deposits were=20
      being emplaced at the time of the Flood several thousand years =
ago,=20
      instead of the 60 to 400 millions of years ago accepted by =
uniformitarian=20
      geology. I suggest at least part of the U-series disequilibria =
(19) found=20
      in the Colorado Plateau U deposits is because some U-daughter =
radionuclide=20
      separation occurred at the time of the Flood, and there has been=20
      insufficient time since then to reestablish equilibrium =
conditions.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The high U/Pb ratios and secondary =
<SUP>21O</SUP>Po halos=20
      in the coalified wood samples from the Eocene epoch and the =
Triassic and=20
      Jurassic periods suggest to me that the wood in all these =
formations was=20
      in the same gel-like condition when infiltrated by the U-bearing=20
      solutions. To me these data represent evidence for a concurrent,=20
      single-stage invasion of U into all the different geological =
formations=20
      represented by the coalified wood samples. This is precisely what =
would be=20
      expected on the basis of a Flood-related phenomena.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The dual Po halos also fit well into the Flood =
scenario,=20
      i.e. the presence of a spherical and elliptical Po halo around the =
same=20
      radiocenter suggests a tectonic event occurred within 50 years =
after the=20
      initial infiltration of uranium into the wood samples. A =
readjustment of=20
      the earth's crust after such a massive event is not unexpected. =
Another=20
      implication of the existence of <SUP>210</SUP>Po halos in these =
specimens=20
      is that the transformation of the wood to a semi-coal-like =
condition must=20
      have occurred within a period of about one year. This evidence for =
a rapid=20
      coalification process is in contrast to the generally accepted =
view that=20
      coalification is a long-term geological process.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>THREE TYPES OF POLONIUM HALOS IN =
MINERALS</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Now there are two other Po isotopes =
(<SUP>214</SUP>Po and=20
      <SUP>218</SUP>Po) in the U decay chain besides <SUP>210</SUP>Po, =
but no=20
      halos representative of these other Po isotopes have been found in =

      coalified wood. This is not surprising, because the half-lives of =
the=20
      other Po isotopes are rather short, i.e., t<SUB>=BD </SUB>=3D 3m =
for=20
      <SUP>218</SUP>Po and t<SUB>=BD </SUB>=3D 164 <FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>s for <SUP>214</SUP>Po as are =
the=20
      half-lives of the beta precursors of <SUP>214</SUP>Po, i.e. =
t<SUB>=BD=20
      </SUB>=3D 26.4 m for <SUP>214</SUP>Pb and t<SUB>=BD </SUB>=3D 19.8 =
m for=20
      <SUP>214</SUP>Bi (the precursor of <SUP>218</SUP>Po is the inert =
gas=20
      <SUP>222</SUP>Rn). What is surprising is that all the three types =
of Po=20
      halos occur in certain minerals which typically contain orders of=20
      magnitude less uranium than the U-rich coalified wood. Further, =
the=20
      minerals such as biotite and fluorite must have diffusion rates=20
      considerably lower than those expected for a =
U-solution-infiltrated=20
      specimens of gel-like wood. Figure 7 shows the idealized structure =
of the=20
      different Po halos in comparison with the U halo.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Photographic evidence relating to the existence =
of=20
      different types of Po halos in minerals is shown in Fig. 1. Figure =
1(n)=20
      shows three <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halos of light, medium, and very dark =

      coloration. The slightly higher radii for the darker halos is =
attributable=20
      to the higher dose. Figure 1(o) shows three different =
<SUP>21O</SUP>Po=20
      halos in fluorite. Figure 1(p) shows a <SUP>214</SUP>Po halo in =
biotite,=20
      and Fig. 1(q) shows two <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos in biotite. =
Comparison of=20
      these halos with the idealized ring structure in Fig. 7 shows that =
Po=20
      halos in minerals can be clearly identified by ring structure =
studies=20
      alone. The data in Table 1 shows there is an excellent agreement =
between=20
      the experimentally produced He ion produced coloration bands and =
the Po=20
      halo ring radii.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>An important observation from Fig. 7 is that in =
the=20
      idealized <SUP>238</SUP>U and <SUP>218</SUP>Po patterns, it is =
evident=20
      that the <SUP>222</SUP>Rn ring should be missing from the =
<SUP>218</SUP>Po=20
      halo and resent in the <SUP>238</SUP>U halo. Figures 8 and 9 show =
the=20
      presence of the <SUP>222</SUP>Rn ring in the U halo in contrast to =
its=20
      absence in the <SUP>218</SUP>Po halo. This is unequivocal evidence =
that=20
      the <SUP>218</SUP>Po halo initiated with <SUP>218</SUP>Po rather =
than with=20
      any earlier alpha emitter in the U decay chain. Figures 10 and 11 =
show=20
      <SUP>214</SUP>Po halos and <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos in different =
types of=20
      biotite.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Henderson's (18) original idea that <U>Po halos =
in=20
      minerals</U> may have originated from a secondary source of =
radioactivity=20
      encounters formidable obstacles when closely examined. In most =
cases the=20
      minerals contain only ppm abundances of uranium, which means only =
a=20
      negligible supply of Po daughter atoms is available for capture at =
any=20
      given time. To form a halo these daughter atoms must migrate or =
diffuse so=20
      they can be captured at a collecting site, a problem which is =
compounded=20
      by the low diffusion rates in minerals (11, 20, 21). Despite these =

      objections, in 1979 several investigators suggested their results =
(22)=20
      might provide support for secondary Po halo formation in minerals =
after=20
      all. They were apparently unaware that three years earlier I had =
reported=20
      the experimental observation of secondary <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halos =
in=20
      coalified wood (17). In that report I discussed how even under the =
most=20
      favorable conditions (i. e., an abundant supply of U-daughters in =
a highly=20
      mobile environment) for the formation of secondary Po halos, only =
the=20
      longer half-life <SUP>21O</SUP>Po halos actually formed, the =
reason being=20
      that the shorter half-life Po isotopes generally decayed away =
before they=20
      could be captured at the tiny Pb-Se sites. If these other two Po =
halo=20
      types didn't form under the best conditions in the gel-like wood, =
how=20
      could it be expected they would form naturally in the granites =
where=20
      diffusion rates are vastly lower and the supply of Po atoms is=20
      negligible?</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The identity of U, Th and Po halos in minerals =
has been=20
      confirmed by analyzing the various types of halo radiocenters =
using=20
      scanning electron microscope x-ray fluorescence (SEMXRF) and ion=20
      microprobe mass spectrometric (IMMA) techniques (2, 3). Studies of =
various=20
      Po halo radiocenters in biotite and fluorite have generally shown =
little=20
      or no U in conjunction with anomalously high=20
      <SUP>206</SUP>Pb/-<SUP>207</SUP>Pb and/or Pb/U ratios which would =
be=20
      expected from the decay of Po without the U precursor which =
normally=20
      occurs in U radiohalo centers (2,3). These results were obtained =
clearly=20
      in the analysis (3) of the most unusual array of Po halos which I =
ever=20
      found. That array, shown in Figure 12, has the appearance of a =
pair of=20
      spectacles, hence the designation 'Spectacle Halo.' The Spectacle =
Halo=20
      appearance compounds the problem of explaining its existence on =
the basis=20
      of known physical laws. In conclusion, in spite of attempts to =
define them=20
      out of existence (23), there is demonstrable evidence that Po =
halos do=20
      exist as separate entities (1-3).</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D537=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image5.jpg" width=3D602></P>
      <P align=3Dcenter>&nbsp;</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D268=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image6.jpg" width=3D602></P>
      <P align=3Dcenter>&nbsp;</P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D764=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image7.jpg" width=3D608></P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>POLONIUM HALOS IN MINERALS: AN INDEPENDENT=20
      EVALUATION</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Because of the implications which will be =
attributed to=20
      the presence of Po halos in minerals, it is important that my =
colleagues=20
      be apprised of the independent investigation of these phenomena by =

      Professor Norman Feather. In an exhaustive theoretical treatment =
(24) of=20
      the problem concerning their origin in minerals, Feather concludes =
it is=20
      difficult to account for the existence of Po halos in certain =
minerals on=20
      the basis of known physical principles. His exact words, as given =
in the=20
      synopsis of his paper, are as follows:</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Ever since the discovery of Po-haloes in old =
mica=20
      (Henderson and Sparks 1939) the problem of their origin has =
remained=20
      essentially unsolved. Two suggestions have been made (Henderson =
1939;=20
      Gentry et al. 1973), but neither carries immediate conviction. =
These=20
      suggestions are examined critically and in detail, and the =
difficulties=20
      attaching to the acceptance of either are identified. Because =
these two=20
      suggestions appear to exhaust the logical possibilities of =
explanation, it=20
      is tempting to admit that one of them must be basically correct, =
but=20
      whoever would make this admission must be fortified by credulity =
of a high=20
      order.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>POLONIUM HALOS AND PRIMORDIAL ROCKS: A TEST OF =
THE=20
      HYPOTHESIS</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>I have advanced the hypothesis (25,26) that the =
three=20
      different types of Po halos in minerals represent the decay of =
primordial=20
      Po, in which case the rocks that host these halos, i.e., the =
Precambrian=20
      granites, must be primordial rocks (25,26). By this reasoning the=20
      Precambrian granites are identified as rocks that were created =
almost=20
      instantly as a part of the creation event recorded in Genesis 1:1 =
rather=20
      than rocks that are a product of the evolution of the earth. This=20
      rationale would be without scientific content if I had not also =
stated=20
      (25) that the laboratory synthesis of a hand-sized piece of =
granite or=20
      biotite would be accepted as falsifying my view that the =
Precambrian=20
      granites are created rocks and, likewise, that the subsequent =
production=20
      of <SUP>218</SUP>Po halos in that synthesized specimen of granite =
or=20
      biotite would be accepted as falsifying my view that Po halos in=20
      Precambrian granites originated with primordial polonium. The only =

      response to my repeated (25,26) challenges to perform these =
laboratory=20
      syntheses and falsify the aforementioned evidences for creation =
has thus=20
      far been silence. It is inescapable that these experiments should =
be=20
      successful if the uniformitarian principle is true. Thus, with so =
much at=20
      stake for evolution, I suspect the reason why my evolutionary =
colleagues=20
      have failed to achieve success is because the Precambrian granites =
never=20
      formed by the uniformitarian principle to begin with; hence, to =
attempt to=20
      utilize it now to produce a synthesized piece of granite is just a =
futile=20
      effort. The end result is that the uniformitarian principle is =
essentially=20
      falsified because of its failure to live up to its own =
predictions. But=20
      since all the pieces in the evolutionary puzzle are glued together =
by this=20
      principle, we must now come to the same conclusion about evolution =

      itself.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>A PROPOSED CREATION MODEL AND THE AGE OF THE =
EARTH</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>The evidence for creation cited above suggests =
there may=20
      have been special periods in earth history when physical laws as =
presently=20
      understood were insufficient to explain all the events transpiring =
within=20
      those periods. This evidence also undergirds the formulation of a =
creation=20
      model based on the Judeo-Christian ethic. The creation model =
proposed=20
      herein postulates that on at least three occasions (singularities) =
during=20
      the past 6000 years there were significant exceptions to the=20
      uniformitarian principle within our local cosmos (the Milky Way), =
viz.,=20
      the ex nihilo creation of our galaxy about 6000 years ago, the =
Fall of man=20
      shortly thereafter, and the occurrence of a worldwide Flood about =
4350=20
      years ago. These ages are derived from Scriptural chronology. It =
is=20
      assumed that the creative act which brought the Milky Way into =
existence=20
      also caused the immediate propagation of light throughout the =
galaxy. No=20
      constraints are placed on the age of the universe.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>Singularities and Uniformities: A Complementary=20
      Approach</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>It is essential to understand that uniform =
action of=20
      physical laws <U>between</U> singularities is an integral part of =
this=20
      creation model. Moreover, the occurrence of a singularity does not =
mean a=20
      completely chaotic condition without any laws to govern the =
operations of=20
      nature during that period. During the Flood singularity some =
physical=20
      processes may not have changed at all whereas there is evidence =
others=20
      varied considerably. An enhanced radioactive decay rate during the =
Flood=20
      singularity would have generated a considerable amount of heat, =
thus=20
      initiating volcanic and tectonic activity during and after that =
period.=20
      This three-singularity model appears to be the minimum framework =
that=20
      includes the essential features of the Genesis narrative. Possibly =
the=20
      continent-separating episode recorded in Genesis 10:25, when the =
earth was=20
      divided in the days of Peleg a few hundred years after the Flood, =
should=20
      also be included as a singularity; certainly it must figure =
prominently in=20
      any creation-based reconstruction of earth history that deals with =

      continental drift. However, to simplify matters, the following =
comments=20
      exclude consideration of this event.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>Singularities and the interpretation of =
Radioactive Decay=20
      as Elapsed Time</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>In summary, the creation model envisions an =
initial=20
      creation singularity followed by a short period of uniformity =
until the=20
      second singularity, an event which involved degenerative changes =
in the=20
      biological world and quite possibly modification of some of the =
original=20
      physical laws which governed the earth and our near celestial =
environment.=20
      Another period of uniformity follows, with the modified physical =
laws now=20
      in effect, for about 1600 years down to the longer-duration Flood=20
      singularity. The last period of uniformity extends down to the =
present. In=20
      this scenario U/Pb ratios are presently utilized as indicators of =
elapsed=20
      time <U>since</U> the last singularity . =
<SUP>238</SUP>U/<SUP>206</SUP>Pb=20
      ratios are not used as time measures prior to this last =
singularity=20
      because of conflicting evidence of very high Pb and He retention =
in=20
      natural zircons subjected to a prolonged high temperature =
environment in=20
      deep granite. Those results, discussed below, are consistent with =
a very=20
      young age of the earth, and suggest that the radioactive decay =
rate may=20
      have been enhanced (indeed, had to be if this creation model is =
correct)=20
      during any one of the three singularities. (The Peleg episode =
potentially=20
      adds one more possibility.) The assumption of uniform decay since =
the=20
      Flood is the basis for interpreting the very high U/Pb ratios in =
coalified=20
      wood samples as evidence for a several-thousand-year age of =
specimens=20
      which conventional geology holds to be about 60 to 400 million =
years=20
      old.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>Possible Evidence of Enhanced Radioactive Decay =
from=20
      'Blasting' Halos</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Additional evidence for an enhanced radioactive =
decay=20
      rate comes from Ramdohr's observations on fractured radioactive =
halos in=20
      polished ore sections. He reports (27) that certain radioactive=20
      inclusions, which exhibit a considerable volume increase due to=20
      isotropization from radioactive decay, have in numerous cases been =

      observed to fracture the surrounding mineral in a random pattern. =
Ramdohr=20
      points out that the surrounding mineral should expand slowly over=20
      geological time due to radioactive isotropization, and individual =
cracks=20
      should appear as soon as the elastic limit is reached. He further =
points=20
      out that, while these expansion cracks should occur first along =
cohesion=20
      minimums and grain boundaries, nothing like this happens. =
Individual=20
      cracks surrounding the radioactive inclusion are randomly =
distributed and=20
      evidently occur quite suddenly in the form of an explosive =
fracture and=20
      not a slow expansion. Ramdohr shows many photographs of instances =
wherein=20
      the central inclusion fractures the non-isotropic outer zone. The=20
      occurrence of this phenomenon is worldwide.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>While there might be other alternatives, one =
possible=20
      explanation of these "fractures" or "blasting" halos is that the =
rate of=20
      radioactive decay was at one time far greater than that observed =
today.=20
      The isotropization of the host minerals would have occurred very =
rapidly=20
      due to an anomalous decay rate, and hence fracturing of the outer =
mineral=20
      would be expected.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Age of the Earth and Pb Retention in Deep =
Granite=20
      Cores</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Results pertaining more specifically to a =
recent creation=20
      of the earth come from studies of Pb retention in zircons taken =
from deep=20
      Precambrian granite cores (28). To understand the rationale for =
this last=20
      statement, it must first be understood that the Pb in these =
zircons is=20
      primarily a secondary trace component derived from the decay of =
small=20
      amounts of U and Th. Secondly, this radiogenic Pb has a tendency =
to=20
      migrate or diffuse out of the zircon crystals far more rapidly =
than the=20
      parent U and Th because these elements are relatively tightly =
bound in=20
      lattice sites, whereas the Pb atoms really do not fit into the =
zircon=20
      lattice. Further, since all elements show an exponential increase =
in the=20
      bulk diffusion rate with increasing temperature, and since the =
temperature=20
      in the granite cores increases significantly from near the top =
(105=B0C) to=20
      the bottom (313=B0C) of the granite portion of the drill hole, =
calculations=20
      show that 50 <FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m-size =
zircons taken=20
      from the bottom of the drill hole (313=B0C) should have lost 1% of =
their Pb=20
      content in about 300,000 years. Since the zircons were in cores =
taken from=20
      a Precambrian granite that is estimated to be 1.5 billion years =
old by=20
      conventional geochronology (29), the prediction based on =
uniformitarian=20
      geochronology would be that most of the Pb would have long ago =
diffused=20
      out of the zircons extracted from the deepest cores at 313=B0C. =
But the=20
      results of the experiments did not agree with this prediction; =
rather they=20
      showed equally high retention of Pb in zircons taken from all =
depths. In=20
      fact no Pb loss from zircons at 313=B0C would appear to place an =
upper limit=20
      to the age of this Precambrian granite, which, on the presumption =
that=20
      these granites are primordial rocks, in essence places the same =
limit on=20
      the age of the earth.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Age of the Earth: Limited by Helium =
Retention in Deep=20
      Granite Cores</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Another approach which seemed to hold greater =
prospects=20
      for more closely defining an upper limit for the age of these =
Precambrian=20
      granites (and hence of the earth) was the differential analysis of =
similar=20
      size zircons from these same cores for helium, the second most =
volatile=20
      chemical element known. The helium accumulates in these zircons in =
a=20
      manner similar to the radiogenic Pb, viz., from the alpha =
particles=20
      emitted from trace amounts of U and Th. However, the extreme =
volatility of=20
      this gas means that it diffuses out of the zircons at a far =
greater rate=20
      than Pb. On a purely uniformitarian basis the search for helium in =
these=20
      zircons would quite possibly never have been done because =
conventional=20
      geological wisdom suggests negligible helium retention in zircons=20
      subjected to even 100=B0C for the presumed 1.5 billion year age =
(29) of=20
      those granites. But having already discovered that the Pb =
retention in=20
      these zircons contradicted the age estimates determined by =
radiometric=20
      dating techniques, I decided that, from a creationist perspective, =
the=20
      search might just reveal something of exceptional interest. Groups =
of=20
      zircons from six different depths were repeatedly analyzed for =
helium=20
      using an extremely sensitive gas mass spectrometric system. The =
results=20
      (30) showed a helium retention of about 58% in the tiny 50 <FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">:</FONT>m zircons from 960 meters depth =
(105=B0C),=20
      about 27% in zircons from 2170 meters (151=B0C) and a phenomenal =
17%=20
      retention of helium even at 2900 meters where the temperature is =
197=B0C.=20
      These results show a creation-based perspective of science does =
possess=20
      predictive capabilities which can be scientifically tested.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>It is difficult to understand how such high =
retention=20
      (30) of helium can be accounted for except by restricting the age =
of these=20
      granites (and hence the earth) to something of the order of =
several=20
      thousand years. These results are consistent with an approximate =
6000-year=20
      age of the earth and moreover are in direct conflict with the =
presumed=20
      4.5-billion-year age of the earth determined by radioactive dating =

      techniques. Evolutionary colleagues can prove this deduction for a =
young=20
      age of the earth is wrong if they can show just how this unusually =
high=20
      retention of helium can be deduced from the accepted =
1.5-billion-year age=20
      (29) of those zircons by using only uniformitarian =
principles.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>A CREATION MODEL OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE =
UNIVERSE</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Decades of research in astronomy and cosmology =
have led=20
      to the general belief that the present state of the universe can=20
      ultimately be traced to an initial event popularly known as the =
Big Bang.=20
      Despite this popularity it should be remembered that the Big Bang=20
      cosmological model is only as valid as the fundamental premises =
which=20
      support it. Thus the discussion of the proposed creation model of =
the=20
      universe must necessarily also focus on the validity of the Big =
Bang=20
      theory, whose basic framework consists of the cosmological and=20
      uniformitarian principles together with the general theory of =
relativity.=20
      The previous sections of this article have documented the failure =
of the=20
      uniformitarian principle to provide confirmation for the =
geological=20
      evolution of the Precambrian granites. If this principle cannot =
account=20
      for the evolution of the earth, is it difficult to understand how =
it can=20
      provide a rational basis for constructing an evolutionary model of =
the=20
      universe. It may be argued, however, that the edifice of modern =
cosmology=20
      fits together too well for there to be something wrong with basic=20
      assumptions. This point will receive close examination in the =
following=20
      discussion of the hot Big Bang Model (31,32).</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Big Bang Model and the Bubble =
Relation</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>About 50 years ago Hubble proposed that the =
astronomical=20
      data then available seemed to linearly relate the redshift z of a =
galaxy=20
      with the distance R to the galaxy, and this has become known as =
the Hubble=20
      relation. Since then galactic redshifts have been mainly =
interpreted as=20
      Doppler shifts resulting from high recessional velocities of the =
distant=20
      galaxies and, moreover, have been generally thought to provide =
some of the=20
      strongest evidence for the hot Big Bang model of an expanding =
universe.=20
      (See, however, Hetherington's evaluation (33) of the Hubble =
relation.) The=20
      reason for confidence in this interpretation is that by using the =
general=20
      theory of relativity as the mathematical basis for calculating the =

      space-time development of the primeval fireball, it is possible to =
derive=20
      the z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">%</FONT> R Hubble relation (31,32) =
provided=20
      certain assumptions are made.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Notwithstanding the general belief that the =
accumulated=20
      astronomical data do support a z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">%</FONT> =
R=20
      relation, the fact is that over the past two decades several =
detailed=20
      studies of redshift distributions have been published which call =
the=20
      Hubble relation into question. As early as 1962 Hawkins (34) =
claimed that=20
      the redshift data indicated an approximate quadratic-distance =
redshift=20
      relation, in particular z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">% =
</FONT>R<SUP>2.22</SUP>.=20
      More recently the case for a z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">%=20
      </FONT>R<SUP>2</SUP> relation (for low z) was considerably =
reinforced by=20
      the extensive statistical analyses of Segal (35) and of Nicoll and =
Segal=20
      (36). Even though these latter results have been disputed by =
Sandage et=20
      al. (37), it appears that Nicoll and Segal (38) have responded =
with=20
      stronger evidence for a z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">% =
</FONT>R<SUP>2</SUP>=20
      relation. In fact, Nicoll et al. (39) have gone so far as to claim =

      statistical invalidation of the Hubble relation for low values of =
z. At a=20
      minimum the foregoing results make it very difficult to believe =
that the=20
      redshift data as presently interpreted actually support the Hubble =

      relation, which is the cornerstone of Big Bang cosmology.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>As noted above, the latest analyses of Nicoll =
and Segal=20
      (38) show the redshift data more closely fit what is thought to be =
the=20
      equivalent of a quadratic rather than a linear distance relation. =
The=20
      reason for qualifying the last statement is because astronomers =
measure=20
      not distances but apparent magnitudes, which are first corrected =
for=20
      various factors before being used as a basis for establishing the=20
      magnitude-redshift relation. One important correction involves the =

      assumption that the galactic light intensity (for any given =
frequency=20
      interval) as observed on earth is reduced by two factors of 1+z, =
one for=20
      the redshift itself, and the other for the presumed galactic =
recession. Of=20
      course if the galaxies are not receding, then an unwarranted =
factor has=20
      been introduced into the magnitude correction procedures, and this =
would=20
      affect the perceived redshift distributions.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Big Bang Model and the Cosmic Microwave =
Radiation=20
      (CMR)</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>In 1978 Penzias and Wilson received the Nobel =
prize in=20
      physics for their discovery of the CMR in 1965. Since then it has =
been=20
      widely claimed that this pervasive radiation field is a relic of =
the time=20
      eons ago when radiation quanta decoupled from matter in the =
primeval=20
      fireball (31). According to this theory, the decoupling presumably =

      occurred about 300,000 years after the Big Bang when the primeval =
fireball=20
      had expanded and its temperature had dropped to the point where =
matter and=20
      radiation ceased to interact as it had before. After this time, =
supposedly=20
      about 15 billion years ago, it is believed that this radiation =
propagated=20
      throughout space in an unobstructed fashion to eventually become =
the CMR.=20
      It is essential to note that the radiation leaving the primeval =
fireball=20
      at the time of decoupling was presumably still quite hot (about =
3000=B0K).=20
      The experimental measurements of the CMR temperature at present =
reveal=20
      that it is very cold (3=B0K). But if the radiation from the =
primeval=20
      fireball is assumed not to interact with matter after the time of=20
      decoupling, then how did this initially hot radiation lose its =
energy, or=20
      temperature, to later become the 3=B0K CMR. The standard =
explanation is that=20
      the general relativistic analysis of the space-time expansion of =
the=20
      primeval fireball predicts that the decoupled radiation quanta =
will lose=20
      energy just as a result of the expansion of the universe. There =
is,=20
      however, nothing in modern experimental physics which suggests =
that=20
      radiation quanta change energy by moving through free space. Thus, =
the=20
      standard explanation for this remarkable thousand-fold energy loss =
in the=20
      decoupled radiation quanta depends upon an aspect of general =
relativity=20
      that is unsupported by scientific evidence.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>To avoid possible misunderstandings, some =
recent=20
      experimental results of gravitational effects on photons will be=20
      discussed. Einstein's principle of equivalence, which is =
independent of=20
      general relativity, does not distinguish whether a photon =
traversing a=20
      gravitational potential gradient undergoes a change in energy in =
transit,=20
      or whether its energy is uniquely determined by the gravitational=20
      potential at the point of emission. The earliest Mossbauer =
experiments=20
      (40) on the gravitational redshift could not distinguish between =
these two=20
      alternatives, and it was widely believed that the photon energy =
could=20
      change when passing through a difference in gravitational =
potential. But=20
      recent experimental results (41) suggest the photon energy is=20
      characterized by the gravitational potential at the point of =
emission=20
      rather than varying as the photon moves to a different potential. =
In the=20
      light of these results it is quite difficult for me to believe =
that=20
      radiation quanta can undergo energy loss in free space as =
predicted in the=20
      general relativistic Big Bang model. At this point my views on the =
theory=20
      of relativity need to be clarified.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>I recognize there are some notable experimental =
results=20
      in physics such as apparent time dilation, the transverse Doppler =
effect,=20
      the increase in mass with velocity, and the gravitational bending =
of=20
      light, which are in accord with the predictions of the theory of=20
      relativity. However, these experimental results cannot be used as=20
      confirmations of the special or general theory of relativity =
because there=20
      are other (albeit far lesser known) theories which predict similar =

      results. (See for instance North's (42) review of various =
alternative=20
      theories of gravitation and their predictions.) Further, recently =
Rastall=20
      (43) and especially Marinov (44) have shown independently that it =
is not=20
      necessary to assume the general relativistic framework to obtain =
many of=20
      the same mathematical results. On the other hand, the question of =
whether=20
      the Big Bang model is a correct description of the origin and =
evolutionary=20
      development of the universe is entirely hinged on the ultimate =
validity of=20
      general relativity's fundamental postulate, which in principle =
denies that=20
      privileged reference frames exist. Very germane to this discussion =
is the=20
      recent admission (45) of an eminent physicist to the effect that =
the CMR=20
      presents undeniable experimental evidence for the existence of an =
absolute=20
      reference frame in the universe, a result which is consistent with =

      Marinov's (44) evidence for absolute space-time and also with at =
least one=20
      of the earlier gravitational theories reviewed by North (42). This =
point=20
      is treated in more detail subsequently and it is shown that the =
existence=20
      of the CMR as an absolute reference frame is perhaps the most =
important=20
      evidence that can be adduced for the creation model of the =
universe as=20
      proposed herein. Before engaging in this discussion further, it is =

      necessary to complete the present discussion of the CMR and the=20
      Cosmological Principle.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Measurements have shown the spatial =
distribution of the=20
      CMR is so uniform that it is questionable whether it could have =
been=20
      produced by the Big Bang scenario as it was originally conceived.=20
      Weisskopf (45) has recently reviewed the nature of this and other =
problems=20
      with the Big Bang model, and has discussed the provisional =
solutions=20
      offered by postulating an explosive expansion in the very early =
stages of=20
      the Big Bang. Questions still remain, however, not the least being =
that=20
      the entire scenario assumes some type of grand unification theory =
which=20
      has yet to be verified. But is it consistent for cosmologists on =
one hand=20
      to claim that the universe evolved only through the action of =
known=20
      physical laws and on the other hand to devise solutions to =
cosmological=20
      problems by using unverified hypotheses as a basis for those =
solutions? We=20
      have already noted the failure of the uniformitarian principle to=20
      successfully account for the origin of Po halos in Precambrian =
granites,=20
      or to provide a basis for synthesis of a piece of granite. In a =
similar=20
      manner it seems the introduction of unverified physical concepts =
as the=20
      basis for possible solutions to difficult evolutionary =
cosmological=20
      problems is just the inevitable result of the failure to explain =
the=20
      creation of the universe on the basis of the uniformitarian =
principle. In=20
      any event, the newly proposed expansionary modification to the Big =
Bang=20
      only deals with the earliest instants of the Big Bang, after which =
it is=20
      supposed the expansion of the primeval fireball continues as =
envisioned in=20
      the original Big Bang model. As we shall soon see, it appears =
there may be=20
      a contradiction involved in the theoretical development of =
expansion of=20
      the fireball.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Big Bang Model and the Cosmological =
Principle</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>In spite of the foregoing difficulties it might =
still be=20
      argued that Big Bang model must be correct because it predicts a =
universe=20
      in accord with the Cosmological Principle, viz., that the universe =
appears=20
      the same irrespective of the location of the observer in the =
universe. The=20
      problem with this argument is that we really do not know the =
Cosmological=20
      Principle is true. In fact, all that we know is that the large =
scale=20
      structure of the universe appears to be approximately isotropic =
(i. e.,=20
      the same in all directions) from our present point of observation. =
Modern=20
      cosmology justifies the Cosmological Principle by coupling the =
observation=20
      of isotropy about our position with the assumption that our galaxy =
does=20
      not occupy a special position in the universe. That is, if our =
galaxy=20
      occupies a non-specific or arbitrary position in the universe, =
then it=20
      follows the universe must be isotropic everywhere and hence =
homogeneous as=20
      well.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>But what if our galaxy does occupy a privileged =
position=20
      in the universe? First, it would no longer be logical to =
extrapolate the=20
      isotropy which we observe to the other parts of the universe, =
which means=20
      it would no longer be possible to justify either the condition of=20
      homogeneity or the cosmological principle. Second, the simplest =
deduction=20
      of the observed isotropy of the universe from our location is that =
the=20
      universe must be spherically symmetric about either the Milky Way =
or some=20
      point which is astronomically nearby. But spherical symmetry about =
any=20
      point in the universe implies that point is the Center, and this =
brings us=20
      to the discussion of the creation model.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>A Creation Model of the Universe: The =
Fundamental=20
      Postulate</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>The fundamental premise of the Judeo-Christian =
creation=20
      model of the universe is determined by the scripture, "The Lord =
has=20
      established His throne in the heavens, and His kingdom ruleth over =
all."=20
      Psalm 103:19 (RSV). On the basis of this statement it is evident =
that the=20
      Creator has established, or fixed, His throne at some point in the =

      universe, which in my view is none other than the Center of the =
universe.=20
      It is axiomatic that a fixed point in the universe requires the =
existence=20
      of a fixed or absolute reference frame. Previously it was noted =
that the=20
      CMR has been recognized as establishing an absolute reference =
frame (45);=20
      so it is quite clear that the fundamental postulate of this =
creation model=20
      of the universe is based on tangible scientific evidence.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The Revolving Steady State Model of the =
Universe: A Brief=20
      Description</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Assuming there is a Center (C) to the universe, =
I propose=20
      that the galaxies are not receding from each other as presently =
supposed,=20
      but instead are revolving at different distances and at different=20
      tangential speeds around C. On this basis all galaxies must have a =

      tangential velocity around C. Measurements have shown that our =
solar=20
      system, and hence the Milky Way, has a cosmic velocity through the =
CMR=20
      (46), and it is this velocity which is identified with the =
tangential=20
      velocity of the Milky Way around C. In this view C must lie =
somewhere in=20
      that plane which passes through the MW which is also perpendicular =
to the=20
      cosmic velocity vector of the MW. It is evident that the RSS model =

      pictures the galaxies orbiting C in any one of many =
different-sized=20
      concentric shells which suggests the alternate designation 'Shell =
Model of=20
      the Universe.'</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>As originally conceived this Revolving Steady =
State (RSS)=20
      model envisions a universe with galaxies which move in circular =
orbits=20
      under the gravitational field produced by all of them. The field =
is=20
      assumed to be stationary and spherically symmetric. Decades ago =
Einstein=20
      made a general relativity study (47) of circulating particles =
constrained=20
      by this type of gravitational field, but his analysis did not =
mention=20
      redshifts, nor was there any hint that he considered his analysis =
had any=20
      reference to the structure of the universe.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The RSS Model and Galactic Redshifts</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Assuming the galaxies are revolving in =
different orbital=20
      planes and with different tangential velocities v around some =
universal=20
      center C, initially I thought that if the Milky Way was one of the =

      innermost galaxies, then most of the galactic redshifts as =
observed on=20
      earth might be due to a combination of gravitational and =
transverse=20
      Doppler effects. (A literature search showed that Burcev (48) had =
proposed=20
      over a decade ago that quasars were possibly stellar objects whose =

      redshifts might be attributable to the transverse Doppler =
effect.)</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Although questions have arisen about this =
explanation for=20
      the galactic redshifts in the RSS model, it seems worthwhile to =
explain my=20
      original rationale and the objections which now appear to present=20
      themselves. In particular, in the Newtonian-based RSS model the =
galaxies=20
      of mass m and tangential velocity v remain in circular orbits by=20
      gravitational attraction of the total mass M within the sphere of =
orbital=20
      radius R. In this scenario, mv<SUP>2</SUP>/R =3D =
mMG/R<SUP>2</SUP>, or=20
      v<SUP>2</SUP> =3D GM/R, where G is the gravitational constant. =
Thus an=20
      observer on an innermost galaxy located at a distance =
R<SUB>1</SUB> from C=20
      would in theory see light from a more distant galaxy (at =
R<SUB>2</SUB>=20
      from C) shifted in frequency because of the transverse Doppler =
effect and=20
      the change in gravitational potential V(R) =3D -GM/R. The presumed =
limiting=20
      distance R' at which galaxies could remain in stable orbits would =
be when=20
      the tangential velocity v =3D c, the velocity of light. Beyond =
this presumed=20
      galactic cutoff distance the RSS model tentatively assumes a =
rapidly=20
      diminishing mass/energy density so that we do not encounter an =
infinite=20
      gravitational potential (see discussion of equations (2) and (3) =
for more=20
      details).</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The frequency shifts expected in the RSS model =
can be=20
      compared to an earth-bound observer comparing the frequency of a =
light=20
      signal emitted from his position on the rotating earth's surface, =
where=20
      the tangential velocity is v<SUB>1</SUB>, and the gravitational is =

      V<SUB>1</SUB>, with the frequency of the same signal emitted from =
an=20
      <U>overhead</U> satellite which is orbiting with velocity =
v<SUB>2</SUB> in=20
      a gravitational potential V<SUB>2</SUB>. The experimentally =
confirmed (41)=20
      equation for the redshift, as derived from the principle of =
equivalence,=20
      is:</P><B><FONT size=3D5>
      <P align=3Dcenter>(1) z =3D (V<SUB>1</SUB> - V<SUB>2</SUB>) / C =
<SUP>2</SUP> =96=20
      (v<SUB>1</SUB><SUP>2</SUP> - v<SUB>2</SUB><SUP>2</SUP> ) / 2=20
      C<SUP>2</SUP>.</P></B></FONT>
      <P align=3Djustify>The same equation applies in the RSS model =
except that=20
      v<SUB>1</SUB> and V<SUB>1</SUB> are the cosmic velocity and =
gravitational=20
      potential of the Milky Way at R<SUB>1</SUB> from C whereas =
v<SUB>2</SUB>=20
      and V<SUB>2</SUB> represent the same quantities for a more distant =
galaxy=20
      at R<SUB>2</SUB> from C.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Another source of frequency shifts arises =
because the=20
      Milky Way (MW) is not exactly at C. In this case the more distant=20
      galaxies, which are rotating away from or toward the MW, produce =
first=20
      order Doppler redshifts or blueshifts. The blueshifts, which would =
be most=20
      pronounced for nearby galaxies, can be eliminated for all =
practical=20
      purposes if it is assumed that the more distant galaxies are =
rotating away=20
      from the MW. This scenario would result in a recessional redshift =
which,=20
      because it depends on the cosine of the angle between the velocity =
vector=20
      of the outer galaxy and the line of sight from the MW to that =
galaxy,=20
      would diminish with distance. Thus, of itself this redshift could =
at most=20
      be only a part of the total galactic redshift observed on the =
earth. Of=20
      course, a significant distance-related redshift, irrespective of =
its=20
      origin, could overshadow most blueshifts expected from galaxies =
rotating=20
      toward the MW and eliminate the need for assuming rotation away =
from the=20
      MW.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>We now return to the discussion of the =
redshifts expected=20
      on the basis of eq. (1). If the <FONT face=3D"WP Greek =
Century">D</FONT>,=20
      the mass/energy density of the universe is assumed to be constant =
then M =3D=20
      4 <FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">BD</FONT> R<SUP>3</SUP>/3, and=20
      substitution of the appropriate quantities into eq. (1) leads to =
the=20
      formal result that z is proportional to R<SUP>2</SUP> , which is =
of the=20
      same form of the redshift relation proposed in references =
(33,34,37-39).=20
      On a similar basis, if the density is assumed to vary inversely as =
R, then=20
      one can obtain an expression for z which is proportional to R, =
which is of=20
      the same form as the Hubble relation (49).</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Of course, astronomers measure apparent =
magnitudes, not=20
      distances, and, for there to be a quantitative comparison between =
the=20
      above results and the redshift distribution, the light flux =
relation for=20
      the RSS model must be formulated so as to include the combined =
effect of=20
      the redshift and gravitational focusing. This formulation has yet =
to be=20
      done; thus on this basis alone it would be premature to claim the =
forgoing=20
      results are consistent with the galactic redshift relation =
proposed by=20
      Nicoll and Segal (38). Moreover it should be remembered that if =
the=20
      universe is revolving, then an extraneous factor has been included =
into=20
      the data which comprise the redshift distribution, and this would =
preclude=20
      any immediate comparison. But regardless of the outcome of the =
above=20
      calculations, there seems to be a more fundamental objection to =
the=20
      preceding formulation.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>In particular, we must carefully investigate =
whether the=20
      gravitational potential V =3D - GM/R used in the above =
calculations is the=20
      correct expression for the potential function. It is of crucial =
importance=20
      to know whether it is correct for it is used as the basis for the=20
      derivation of the Hubble relation (31,32) in Big Bang cosmology. =
According=20
      to Silk (31) and Weinberg (32), its use in computing the potential =
at the=20
      surface of an arbitrarily large, but finite sphere, of radius R =
within an=20
      infinite universe is justified by a theorem due to Birkhoff. Part =
of the=20
      proof of this theorem implicitly assumes that the universe is =
structured=20
      according to the Cosmological Principle. Now the creation model of =
the=20
      universe proposed herein is also of infinite extent, but the =
Cosmological=20
      Principle does not hold, so that there is no basic reason why this =
theorem=20
      should yield the correct gravitational potential in the RSS model. =
But=20
      should it hold for the Big Bang model?</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>To answer this question we first note that the =
negative=20
      gradient of the potential V =3D -GM/R yields a repulsive force per =
unit mass=20
      F/m =3D GM/R<SUP>2</SUP> whereas there is an experimentally =
confirmed=20
      theorem in classical mechanics which definitely requires an =
attractive=20
      force per unit mass F/m =3D -GM/R<SUP>2</SUP> to exist at any =
point R within=20
      a sphere enclosing a uniform mass distribution. This latter result =
is an=20
      integral part of both the RSS and the Big Bang models. Thus the =
potential=20
      V =3D -GM/R is just as wrong for the Big Bang model as it would be =
for the=20
      RSS model because it yields an incorrect sign for the force. Even =
Silk's=20
      (31) elementary treatment (see page 332) makes it clear that the=20
      derivation of the Friedmann equation for the Big Bang expanding =
universe=20
      is based on the potential V =3D -GM/R. Here we have a logical =
contradiction=20
      in the theoretical development of the primeval fireball, which is =
of=20
      course the basis for predicting the Hubble relation in the Big =
Bang.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>An expression for the potential (50,51) which =
does yield=20
      the correct attractive force is given by </P>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D141=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image8.jpg" width=3D324></P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The problem here is that for a finite, uniform =
density we=20
      encounter an infinite potential due to the presumed infinite size =
of the=20
      universe. This result is the same for both the Big Bang model and =
the RSS=20
      model.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Alternatively, a finite potential can be =
obtained from=20
      eq. (2) by assuming the density diminishes more rapidly than=20
      1/R<SUP>3</SUP> after R', where v =3D c. As a first approximation =
this=20
      assumption truncates the potential at R'. In this case the upper=20
      integration limits in eq. (2) must be changed from infinity to R', =
and we=20
      have the following potential: </P><FONT color=3D#ff00ff>
      <P align=3Dcenter><IMG height=3D128=20
      src=3D"http://www.halos.com/book01/Image9.jpg" =
width=3D362></P></FONT>
      <P align=3Djustify>If this potential is used in eq. (1) to compute =
z for the=20
      RSS model, then for a uniform density for all R less than R', we =
find the=20
      redshift is zero. If, however, the density increases as =
R<SUP>O.22</SUP>=20
      then we can formally obtain a relation (51) similar to that =
deduced by=20
      Hawkins (34). Again, however, it is premature to make any claims =
about=20
      this result until more work is done. </P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Another possibility for obtaining redshifts in =
the RSS=20
      model is to assume the mass/energy density diminishes as =
1/R<SUP>4</SUP>.=20
      In this case the galactic orbits are no longer circular but =
spirals, and=20
      there is a recessional component to the velocity which leads to a =
first=20
      order Doppler shift and a Hubble type z <FONT face=3D"WP MathA">% =
</FONT>r=20
      relation. For this view to have any credibility most of the =
mass/energy of=20
      the universe must be in a form other than the matter and radiation =
energy=20
      presently observed and/or inferred in stellar systems and =
intergalactic=20
      dust. In this context it is perhaps worth mentioning that Ellis =
(52) has=20
      proposed that there may be a large amount of undetected =
mass/energy in=20
      other forms (e.g., neutrinos) which could raise the cosmic =
mass/energy=20
      density to more than a million times the present density estimates =
of=20
      10<SUP>-31</SUP>to 10<SUP>-29</SUP>g/cm<SUP>3</SUP>.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Of course the RSS model does not require that =
the=20
      redshifts are velocity dependent. In this respect it is well known =
that=20
      years ago proponents of a static or steady state universe proposed =
a=20
      variety of distance-dependent interpretations of the redshift =
which were=20
      non-recessional in nature (see North's (42) review for details and =

      references). The investigation of the origin of the redshifts in =
the RSS=20
      model should include a reexamination of these alternatives.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>Estimates of the Distance from the Milky Way to =
the=20
      Center</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Earlier it was implied that the Milky Way could =
be one of=20
      the innermost galaxies in the RSS model. This view is based on the =

      assumption that the Milky Way's cosmic galactic velocity of 550 =
km/s=20
      through the CMR (46) is just the tangential velocity of the Milky =
Way (MW)=20
      around C. Galactic peculiar motions may also be of the same =
nature. On=20
      this basis we can compute the angular velocity <FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">T</FONT> of the MW around C from v<SUP>2 =
</SUP>=3D=20
      <FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">T</FONT><SUP>2</SUP>R<SUP>2 =
</SUP>=3D GM/R,=20
      which leads to the result that <FONT face=3D"WP Greek =
Century">T</FONT> =3D=20
      2(<FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">BD</FONT>G/3) =
<SUP>=BD</SUP>.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>For a constant <FONT face=3D"WP Greek =
Century">D</FONT> =3D=20
      10<SUP>-29</SUP> g/cm <SUP>3</SUP>, then <FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">T</FONT> =3D 5 x 10<SUP>-11</SUP> rad/y, =
and the=20
      distance from C to our galaxy would be about 3.7 x 10<SUP>7</SUP>=20
      light-years. (C of course would be located somewhere in the plane=20
      perpendicular to the direction of the motion of the MW through the =
CMR.)=20
      If <FONT face=3D"WP Greek Century">D</FONT> =3D=20
      10<SUP>-27</SUP>g/cm<SUP>3</SUP> then <FONT=20
      face=3D"WP Greek Century">T</FONT> =3D 5 x 10<SUP>-10</SUP> rad/y =
(or 5 x=20
      10<SUP>-5</SUP> arc-s/y), which means that differential angular =
motions of=20
      the more distant galaxies (as observed at the MW) would still be =
below the=20
      present detection limit of light telescopes (<FONT=20
      face=3D"WP MathA">=95</FONT>10<SUP>-3</SUP> arc-s/y). In the =
latter case the=20
      distance from the MW to C is about 3.7 x lO<SUP>6</SUP> =
light-years and is=20
      considered the preferred value so as reduce potential blueshift =
effects.=20
      This distance places C <U>outside our galaxy </U>but still in the =
plane=20
      which is perpendicular to the MW's cosmic velocity vector. No=20
      observational data as yet seems to locate the direction of C in =
that=20
      plane. On the other hand Orion is in that plane, and is =
prominently=20
      mentioned in Scripture (Job 9:9;38:31, Amos 5:8). As a working =
hypothesis=20
      I suggest that C may lie a few million light years beyond Orion. =
One=20
      density used in the preceding calculations is higher than current=20
      estimates but, as previously noted Ellis (52) has suggested there =
may be a=20
      large amount of undetected mass/energy which may raise the value =
to more=20
      than 10<SUP>-24</SUP> g/cm<SUP>3</SUP>. On this basis the higher =
density=20
      estimate is not unreasonable. In the RSS model the value of the =
density=20
      cannot much exceed 10<SUP>-26</SUP> g/cm<SUP>3</SUP> or else the =
angular=20
      velocity will increase to the point where differential motions of =
distant=20
      galaxies would be observed.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The RSS Model and Olber's Paradox</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>We briefly digress to note that Olber's Paradox =
is=20
      resolved if the universe is structured according to the RSS model =
because=20
      the finite number of galaxies within a sphere of radius R=92 will =
only=20
      produce a finite light flux at the Milky Way. Even if there is =
luminous=20
      matter beyond R', the density is assumed to diminish so rapidly =
that the=20
      light flux received at the Milky Way from beyond R' will also be=20
      finite.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The RSS Model and Varshni's Analysis of Quasar=20
      Redshifts</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>In the context of the present proposal for the =
structure=20
      of the universe it is most appropriate to refer to Varshni's (53)=20
      investigation of the redshift distribution of 384 quasars. From a=20
      probability analysis of those 384 quasars he found an astounding =
57 sets=20
      of redshift coincidences within small redshift intervals. Varshni=20
      calculates the probability of chance coincidence of these groups =
to be=20
      about 10<SUP>-85</SUP>. He concludes that <U>if quasar redshifts =
are real=20
      (he thinks they are not) and are of cosmological origin) i.e., =
distance=20
      related, </U>then the only logical deduction from the data is, in =
his own=20
      words, as follows:</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>The Earth is indeed the center of the Universe. =
The=20
      arrangement of quasars on certain spherical shells is only with =
respect to=20
      the Earth. These shells would disappear if viewed from another =
galaxy or a=20
      quasar. This means that the cosmological principle will have to =
go. Also,=20
      it implies that a coordinate system fixed to the Earth will be a =
preferred=20
      frame of reference in the Universe. Consequently, both the Special =
and the=20
      General Theory of Relativity must be abandoned for cosmological=20
      purposes.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P align=3Djustify>These deductions are amazingly similar to the =
deductions=20
      of the RSS model except that, first, the earth, or MW, is only=20
      astronomically close to rather than being exactly at the Center, =
and,=20
      second, the absolute reference frame is defined by the CMR and not =
the=20
      position of the earth. And from earlier discussions in this =
article, it=20
      should now be clear that the special and the general theory of =
relativity=20
      are not credible theories in the RSS model. In fact, as shown =
below, if=20
      anything it now appears that the results of one of the most =
celebrated=20
      experiments in the history of physics contradict the basic =
premises of=20
      both special and general relativity so directly that, to me at =
least, it=20
      seems these theories are no longer tenable. As noted earlier, =
however,=20
      just because special and general relativity are shown to be =
untenable does=20
      not invalidate all the mathematical results obtained by these =
theories. It=20
      suggests rather that there must exist an absolute space-time =
framework=20
      which would encompass all the results of relativity which do =
accord with=20
      experiment, but different results where relativity theory makes =
incorrect=20
      predictions. Several investigations pertaining to this alternative =

      framework have already been cited (42-44). In addition we should =
also=20
      mention Clube's (54) work and his exchanges with others (55) on=20
      neo-Lorentzian relativity.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>The RSS Model, the CMR, and the Theory of=20
      Relativity</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Clube's (54) explanation for the CMR is =
undergirded by=20
      the assumption of a non-relativistic Lorentz invariant material =
vacuum. It=20
      is intriguing to consider that the CMR may be the result of =
emissions from=20
      a cold material vacuum. On a related matter, Clube cites other =
work (56)=20
      as evidence that observations are not at all inconsistent with an=20
      essentially Euclidean infinite cosmos. Certainly these ideas =
appear easily=20
      reconcilable with the RSS model since they assume the existence of =
an=20
      absolute reference frame. However, the details of Clube's theory =
have yet=20
      to be worked out so it is premature to make any claims until =
further work=20
      is done. Of course there is also the possibility that the CMR may =
be a=20
      part of the 'light' that was created in Gen. 1:3. Interestingly, =
Weisskopf=20
      (45) alludes to that very possibility in the closing paragraph of =
his=20
      recent article:</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Indeed, the Judeo-Christian tradition describes =
the=20
      beginning of the world in a way that is surprisingly similar to =
the=20
      scientific model. Previously, it seemed scientifically unsound to =
have=20
      light created before the sun. The present scientific view does =
indeed=20
      assume the early universe to be filled with various kinds of =
radiation=20
      long before the sun was created. The Bible says about the =
beginning: "And=20
      God said, 'Let there be light'; and there was light. And God saw =
the=20
      light, that it was good."</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P align=3Djustify>Irrespective of how it originated, the most =
important=20
      fact about the CMR is that it represents unequivocal evidence of =
an=20
      absolute reference frame in the universe, a very necessary =
condition in=20
      the RSS model, but an inconsistent condition for the relativistic=20
      foundations of the Big Bang model. To explicitly show exactly how =
this=20
      inconsistency arises, it is most helpful to include another quote =
from=20
      Weisskopf's recent article:</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>It is remarkable that we now are justified in =
talking=20
      about an absolute motion, and that we can measure it. The great =
dream of=20
      Michelson and Morley is realized. They wanted to measure the =
absolute=20
      motion of the earth by measuring the velocity of light in =
different=20
      directions. According to Einstein, however, this velocity is =
always the=20
      same. But the 3K radiation represents a fixed system of =
coordinates. It=20
      makes sense to say that an observer is at rest in an absolute =
sense when=20
      the 3K radiation appears to have the same frequencies in all =
directions.=20
      Nature has provided an absolute frame of reference. The deeper=20
      significance of this concept is not yet clear.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P align=3Djustify>With all due respect to my eminent colleague I =
suggest=20
      the meaning of this fact is not obscure at all. I suggest the =
evidence=20
      (the CMR) which has received worldwide acclaim as confirmation of =
the Big=20
      Bang is in reality its death knell for, ironically, it is now =
clear that=20
      the existence of the CMR essentially falsifies the fundamental =
postulates=20
      of the theory of relativity. The logic is quite straightforward. =
Referring=20
      to the last quotation by Weisskopf, we note he mentions the famed=20
      Michelson-Morley experiment, which achieved only a null result. =
</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Lorentz's efforts to explain this null result =
on the=20
      basis of an absolute reference frame were supposedly untenable. =
The real=20
      explanation, according to almost every physics textbook written in =
the=20
      past 60 years, was given by the theory of relativity, namely that: =

      <U>Given the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment, if =
the=20
      fundamental principles of relativity are true, then there is no =
absolute=20
      reference frame.</U> But the CMR is an absolute reference frame, =
so the=20
      original relativistic deductions about the Michelson-Morley =
experiment are=20
      in error. More precisely, since logic requires the contrapositive =
of a=20
      statement to be equivalent to the statement itself, the preceding =
"if=20
      relativity is true, then no absolute reference frame" statement =
must be=20
      equivalent to "if an absolute reference frame exists, then the =
fundamental=20
      principles of relativity are untrue." <U>In simpler terms the =
theory of=20
      relativity has been falsified because a major prediction of the =
theory is=20
      now known to be contradicted by an unambiguous experimental =
result.</U>=20
      Without relativity theory there is no Big Bang, no Hubble relation =
for the=20
      redshift, and no explanation for the CMR in an evolutionary =
cosmological=20
      model.</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, REFLECTIONS, AND =
CONCLUSIONS</P></B>
      <P align=3Djustify>Special thanks goes to Drs. Frank Awbrey and =
Bill=20
      Thwaites, Biology Department, San Diego State University, for =
extending to=20
      me the opportunity of participating in this symposium, and for =
their=20
      understanding and patience during the revision of this =
contribution.=20
      Special thanks also to Dr. Alan Leviton, Director, Pacific =
Division of the=20
      AAAS, who very kindly undertook the task of translating my =
computer disks=20
      into a finished manuscript.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>Several years ago the American Physical Society =
sent its=20
      members a copy of the National Academy of Sciences resolution of =
April=20
      1976, "An Affirmation of Freedom of Inquiry and Expression," which =
reads=20
      in part ". . .That the search for knowledge and understanding of =
the=20
      physical universe and of the living things that inhabit it should =
be=20
      conducted under conditions of intellectual freedom, without =
religious=20
      political or ideological restrictions. . . . That freedom of =
inquiry and=20
      dissemination of ideas require that those so engaged be free to =
search=20
      where their inquiry leads. . . without political censorship and =
without=20
      fear of retribution in consequence of unpopularity of their =
conclusions.=20
      Those who challenge existing theory must be protected from =
retaliatory=20
      reactions."</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>In recent years the lofty aim of that =
resolution has not=20
      been realized as I have tried to pursue my research. In my opinion =
some of=20
      my more influential colleagues have found it easier to support =
this NAS=20
      resolution for foreign dissident scientists than for an American =
scientist=20
      who dissents from evolution. In fact I read in a recent issue of =
Science=20
      (57) that the NAS itself has recently stepped up its anti-creation =

      campaign by the widespread distribution of a publication which =
claims that=20
      creationism is not science. I will present the opposite viewpoint =
in my=20
      forthcoming book (58) while also relating some details concerning =
my=20
      difficulties in pursuing research in this somewhat controversial =
field.=20
      The impact of aforementioned NAS resolution on my research efforts =

      receives special attention.</P>
      <P align=3Djustify>In closing I wish to express my gratitude to =
those of my=20
      evolutionary colleagues who on so many occasions have assisted me, =
and on=20
      other occasions have collaborated with me in my research. Of one =
thing I=20
      am certain: Only in America could my research over the past two =
decades=20
      have been accomplished. I close by expressing gratitude to my =
Creator for=20
      allowing me the privilege of being an American. I submit this =
article to=20
      the scientific community not as an antagonist who purports to have =
the=20
      last word on the subject, but as a colleague who, in the spirit of =
free=20
      scientific inquiry, genuinely seeks a vigorous, critical response =
to the=20
      evidence presented herein. Perhaps a future "Evolutionists =
Confront=20
      Creationists" AAAS symposium would be the ideal forum for this =
exchange to=20
      occur.</P>
      <P>&nbsp;</P><B>
      <P align=3Dcenter>REFERENCES</P></B>
      <P>&nbsp;</P>
      <P>1. Gentry, Robert V. 1973. Annual Rev. Nucl. Sci. 23: 347.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>2. Gentry, Robert V. 1974. Science 184: 62.</P>
      <P>3. Gentry, Robert V. et al. 1974. Nature 252: 564.</P>
      <P>4. Joly, J. 1917. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A. 217: =
51-79;=20
      Idem. 1917. Nature 99: 457-58, 476-78; Idem. 1923. Proc. Roy. Soc. =
London=20
      Ser. A102: 682-705; Idem. 1924. Nature 114: 160-64.</P>
      <P>5. Kerr-Lawson, D. E. 1928. Univ. Toronto Stud. Geol. Ser. No.=20
27:15</P>
      <P>6. Henderson, G. H, C. M. Mushkat, D. P. Crawford. 1934. Proc. =
R. Soc.=20
      Lond. Ser. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 158: 199.</P>
      <P>7. Henderson, G. H, and L. G. Turnbull. 1934. Proc. R. Soc. =
Lond. Ser.=20
      A. Math. Phys. Sci. 145: 582.</P>
      <P>8. Henderson, G. H, and S. Bateson. Ibid., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. =
Ser. A.=20
      Math. Phys. Sci. 145: 573.</P>
      <P>9. Schilling, A., 1926. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 53A: 241. =
See also=20
      Oak Ridge Nat. Lab. Rep. ORNL-tr-697.</P>
      <P>10. Mahadevan, C., 1927. Indian J. Phys. 1: 445.</P>
      <P>11. Gentry, Robert V. 1968. Science 160: 1228.</P>
      <P>12. Gentry, Robert V. 1971. Science 173: 727.</P>
      <P>13. Gentry, Robert V. et al. 1973. Nature 244: 282.</P>
      <P>14. Gentry, Robert V. 1978. Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence =
for=20
      SHE? <U>In</U> Proc. International Symposium on Superheavy =
Elements.=20
      Lubbock, March 1978. Pergamon Press, New York, Oxford.</P>
      <P>15. Gentry, R. V, W. H. Christie, D. H. Smith, J. W. Boyle, =
S.S.<I>=20
      </I>Cristy, &amp;</P>
      <P>J. F. McLaughlin. 1978. Nature 274: 457.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>16. Gentry, R. V. 1970. Science 169: 670.</P>
      <P>17. Gentry, R. V, W. H. Christie, D. H. Smith, J. E. Emery, S. =
A.=20
      Reynolds, R.</P>
      <P>W. Walker, S. S. Cristy, &amp; P. A. Gentry. 1976. Science 194: =

315.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>18. Henderson, G. H. and F. W. Sparks 1939. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. =
Ser. A=20
      Math. Phys. Sci. 173: 238. Henderson, G. H., ibid., p. 250.</P>
      <P>19. Lind, S. C., and C. P. Whittemore. 1915. U. S. Bur. Mines =
Tech.=20
      Pap. 88:1. Stern, T. W., and L. R. Stieff, 1959. U.S. Geol. Surv. =
Prof.=20
      Pap. 320:151. Rosholt, J. N., 1958. <U>In</U> Proceedings of the =
Second U.=20
      N. International Conference on the Peaceful-Uses of Atomic Energy, =
Geneva.=20
      United Nations, New York, vol. 2, p. 321.</P>
      <P>20. Gentry, Robert V. 1975. Nature 258: 269.</P>
      <P>21. Fremlin, J. H. 1975. Nature 258: 269.</P>
      <P>22. Hashemi-Nezhad, S. R., et al., 1979. Nature: 178: =
333-335.</P>
      <P>23. Moazed, C., R. M. Spector, and R. F. Ward. 1973. Science =
180:=20
      1272.</P>
      <P>24. Feather, N. 1978. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Commun. 11: 147.</P>
      <P>25. Gentry, Robert V. 1979. EOS 60: 474. Idem. 1980. EOS 61: =
514.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>26. Gentry, Robert V. 1982. Physics Today 35: No. 10, 13. =
Ibid., 36:=20
      No. 4, 13.</P>
      <P>27. Ramdohr. P. 1957. Abb. der Deutsch. Adad. d. Wiss., Berlin, =
Kl. f.=20
      Chem., Geol. u. Biologie, no. 2: 1. See also Oak Ridge National =
Laboratory=20
      Translation (ORNL-tr-755).</P>
      <P>28. Gentry, Robert V., T. J. Sworski, H. S. McKown, D. H. =
Smith, R. E.=20
      Eby, W. H. Cristie. 1982. Science 216: 296. See also R. V. Gentry. =
1984.=20
      Science 223:835.</P>
      <P>29. Zartman, R. E. 1979. Los Alamos Sci. Lab. Rep. =
LA-7923-MS.</P>
      <P>30. Gentry, R. V., G. Glish, &amp; E. R. McBay. 1982. Geophys. =
Res.=20
      Lett. 9:1129.</P>
      <P>31. Silk, J. 1979. The Big Bang. W. H. Freeman &amp; Co., San=20
      Francisco.</P>
      <P>32. Weinberg, S. 1972. Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, New =
York.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>33. Hetherington, Norriss. 1971. Astron. Soc. of the Pacific, =
Leaflet=20
      No. 509, November.</P>
      <P>34. Hawkins, G. S. 1962. Nature 194: 563.</P>
      <P>35. Segal, I. E. 1976. Mathematical Cosmology and Extragalactic =

      Astronomy. Academic Press. Idem. 1975. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 72: =
2473.</P>
      <P>36. Nicoll, J. F. and I. E. Segal. 1975. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. =
72:=20
      4691.</P>
      <P>37. Sandage, A., G. A. Tammann, and A. Yahil. 1979. Ap. J. 232: =

352.</P>
      <P>38. Nicoll, J. F. and I. E. Segal. 1982. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. =
79:=20
      3913.</P>
      <P>Idem. 1982. Ap. J. 258: 457. Idem. 1982. Astron. &amp; =
Astrophys. 115:=20
      398. See also Segal, I.E. 1982. Ap. J. 252: 37.</P>
      <P>39. Nicoll, J. F. et al. 1980. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. 77: =
6275.</P>
      <P>40. Pound, R. V. and J. L. Snider. 1964. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13: =
539.=20
      Idem. 1965. Phys. Rev. 140: B788.</P>
      <P>41. Alley, C. 0. 1982. Proper Time Experiments in Gravitational =
Fields=20
      with</P>
      <P>Atomic Clocks, Aircraft, and Laser Light Pulses. <U>In</U> =
Quantum=20
      Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and Measurement Theory. Edited =
by P.=20
      Meystre and M. 0. Scully, Plenum Pub. Corp., New York.</P>
      <P>42. North, J. D. 1965. The Measure of the Universe, Clarendon =
Press,=20
      Oxford.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>43. Rastall, P. 1978. Astrophys. J. 22: 745. Idem. 1979. Can. =
J. Phys.=20
      57: 944.</P>
      <P>44. Marinov, S. 1981. Eppur Si Muove. East West Publishers, =
Graz,=20
      Austria.</P>
      <P>45. Weisskopf, V. F. 1983. Am. Sci. 71, No. 5: 473.</P>
      <P>46. Smoot, G. F. et al. 1977. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39: 898. Idem. =
1979. Ap.=20
      J. 234: L83.</P>
      <P>47. Einstein, A. 1939. Ann. Math. 40: 922.</P>
      <P>48. Burcev, P. 1968. Phys. Lett. 27A: 623.</P>
      <P>49. Gentry, R. V. 1983. Bull. of the Am. Phys. Soc. 28: 30.</P>
      <P>50. Landsberg, P. T. and D. A. Evans. 1979. Mathematical =
Cosmology.=20
      Clarendon Press, Oxford.</P>
      <P>51. Gentry, R. V. 1983. Phys. Today 36, No. 11: 124.</P>
      <P>52. Ellis, G.F.R. et al. 1978. Mon. Not. R. Astr.Soc. 184: =
439.</P>
      <P>53. Varshni, Y. P. 1976. Astrophys. Space Sci. 43: 3. 1977. =
Ibid. 51:=20
      121.</P>
      <P>54. Clube, S.V.M. 1980. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 193: 385. Idem. =
1982.=20
      Proceedings of an International Colloquium on the Scientific =
Aspects of=20
      the Hipparcos Mission, Strasbourg, France (ESA SP-177).</P>
      <P>55. Clube, S.V.M. et al. 1980. Comm. R. Observatory, Edinburgh, =
No.=20
      383: 467.</P>
      <P>56. Jaakkola, T., M. Moles &amp; J. P. Vigier. 1979. Astr. Na.=20
      300:229.</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <P>57. Holden, C. 1984. Science 223: 1274.</P>
      <P>58. Gentry, Robert V. 1984. Creation's Tiny Mystery (to be=20
      published).</P>
      <P>&nbsp;</P>
      <DIR></DIR>
      <DIR></DIR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_02DB_01C4003E.6F827710
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Location: http://www.halos.com/book01/Image1.jpg
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